
Directed by Samuel Fuller
With Lee Marvin, Mark Hamill, Robert Carradine, Bobby Di Cicco, Stéphane Audran
“Cinema is like a battleground: love, hate, action, violence, death… in one word, emotions."
Samuel Fuller in Pierrot le Fou
Writing about Fuller and including the above sentence is a tremendous common place by now. Nevertheless, it is so true and summarizes his films so well that I had to include it.
Seeing a Fuller movie is like going full speed on a highway. He never takes detours, never looses time with unnecessary comments, and everything is allowed if it is to provoke an emotion in the audience. Even if that means to distort a cliché so much until it becomes poetry. This has the effect of giving such a raw intensity to his movies that, whether you like it or not, you can’t easily forget after you’ve seen it. Godard rightly called it “cinema-fist”.
The Big Red One: The Reconstruction is the nearly four-hour epic director’s cut of the movie he did in 1980. We follow a platoon commanded by Lee Marvin through WWII, first in Africa, then in Italy, and finally in Normandy and Germany. It is when they arrive to Normandy that the movie fully takes off and becomes by far the best war movie ever made. We become an omnipresent element in the platoon, guided by Lee Marvin, on his tour of “love, hate, action, violence, death… in one word, emotions” across Europe.
This movie influenced quite obviously Saving Private Ryan, but in my opinion it was even a greater influence to Mallick’s The Thin Red Line. Not only we have all the wild life shots and the communion of the soldiers with nature, but in both movies the war is filmed like a natural disaster, with its horrors and wonders. It starts randomly, messes up deeply with human life and then suddenly stops, just like a volcano or an earthquake.
Of course there’s a crucial difference between Sam Fuller and Terence Mallick: Fuller has absolutely nothing to say and that’s why I love his movies so much. There’s no pretentious metaphysical content whatsoever, just pure raw cinema.
P.S. Truffaut answer to Jakov’s reserves: “Samuel Fuller is not a beginner, he is a primitive; his mind is not rudimentary, it is rude; his films are not simplistic, they are simple and it is this simplicity that I most admire. It is impossible to say to yourself, faced with a Samuel Fuller film, “It should have been done differently, faster, this way or that.” Things are what they are, they are filmed as they must be; this is direct cinema, uncriticizable, irreproachable , “given” cinema rather than assimilated, digested or reflect upon. Fuller doesn’t take time to think; it is clear that he is in his glory when he is shooting.”